Digital resources in the Social Sciences and Humanities OpenEdition Our platforms OpenEdition Books OpenEdition Journals Hypotheses Calenda Libraries OpenEdition Freemium Follow us

Policy insights

This page lists all policy briefs. Some are published directly by ODRIIS, others are not.

 


Policy briefs published by ODRIIS

 

The aim of this Policy Brief series is to disseminate the Observatory’s empirical, methodological and theoretical work to provide the general public and decision- makers with relevant information based on original, evidence-based data.


Measuring, regulating and preventing household debt to better combat poverty

—S. Michiels, A. Natal, I. Guérin, T. Narring.

Available on HAL: hal-05023697

Cite as:
Michiels, S., Natal, A., Guérin, I., & Narring, T. (2025). Measuring, regulating and preventing household debt to better combat poverty. (ODRIIS Policy Brief No. 2). Pondicherry, India. [hal-05023697]


Why and how to measure household debt in informal economies?

—I. Guérin, A. Natal, G. Venkatasubramanian.

Available on HAL: hal-04622836

Cite as:
Guérin, I., Natal, A., & Venkatasubramanian, G.. (2024). Why and how to measure household debt in informal economies?. (ODRIIS Policy Brief No. 1). Pondicherry, India. [hal-04622836]


 

 

 


Policy briefs published by partners

 

The Use of Social Networks in a Self-Inflicted Macroeconomic Shock Context: Demonetisation in India

NOPOOR Policy Brief, No. 36. (2017). Read more »
—I. Guérin, Y. Lanos, S. Michiels, C. J. Nordman, G. Venkatasubramanian.

The demonetisation that occurred in India in November 2016 has created an unprecedented shock. Among other objectives, the measure has been presented as an efficient mean to promote a less cash economy in order to formalise the economy and to promote social protection. Drawing on ground-breaking data collected in rural south-India, this note expresses serious reservations about the stated goals. In the short run, due to the importance of cash in the Indian economy (98 percent of transactions are estimated to be in cash), this measure had strong impacts on employment, daily financial practices, and network use for more than three months, as people relied more strongly on their networks to sustain their economic and social activities. Rather than fighting against it, demonetisation has mostly strengthened the informal economy, while probably marginalising further those who lack networks. In the long run, and in a context like India, where state social protection is still weak and where governmental schemes are known to obey to patronage and clienteles’ networks, having a dense network of relatives, friends and patrons ready to help when needed remains the essential form of securing everyday life and the future. Eliminating such arrangements without offering alternative protection would be counterproductive. While cash less policies flourish in various parts of the world, we believe our findings have major implications and seriously question the merit of such policies, especially for the most marginalised segments of the population.